首页> 外文OA文献 >Should the European Union Ratify the European Convention for Human Rights? Some Remarks on the Relations between the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice
【2h】

Should the European Union Ratify the European Convention for Human Rights? Some Remarks on the Relations between the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice

机译:欧洲联盟应否批准《欧洲人权公约》?关于欧洲人权法院与欧洲法院之间关系的一些评论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This chapter focuses on the relationship between the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the European Union, especially the European Court of Justice (ECJ). It assesses whether the EU should accede to the ECHR - and subsequently whether the parties to the ECHR and accession agreement should ratify it. It sketches the hesitations of the ECJ from its initial sub-ECHR standard review of fundamental rights complaints to its interventions in the accession negotiation debates, jealously protective of its 'prerogatives' within the EU institutional architecture. The latter have led to over-complicated special provisions for the EU, especially the so-called 'prior involvement procedure' and also the 'co-respondent procedure'. These are clear evidence that the EU institutions, the ECJ included, have privileged their institutional prerogatives over the value accession would have for the protection of the fundamental rights of EU citizens. It is explained why the accession is nevertheless a good idea.
机译:本章重点介绍欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)与欧盟,尤其是欧洲法院(ECJ)之间的关系。它评估了欧盟是否应加入ECHR-随后评估ECHR和加入协议的当事方是否应批准它。它勾勒出欧洲法院的犹豫,从最初对基本权利投诉进行的亚欧洲人权法院标准审查到对加入谈判辩论的干预,都在欧洲机构架构内嫉妒地保护其“特权”。后者导致欧盟的特殊规定过于复杂,特别是所谓的“优先参与程序”和“共同代理程序”。这些明确的证据表明,包括欧洲法院在内的欧盟机构都享有其机构特权,而不是享有保护欧盟公民基本权利的价值。解释了为什么加入仍然是一个好主意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号